Sunday, Jul. 18, 2004 - 10:11 p.m.

Vyzygoth Responds

Vyzygoth wrote me the following reply several days ago. I still disagree, of course, but I couldn't think of anything to write back. I considered empathizing with his needs for safety and order, but that didn't seem substantial enough to send in an email. Here it is:

nexus:

i wasn't thrilled by all the phelps said. he went places from which i tried to steer him. however, i stand by mongrelization as ultimately destroying the US. and this tactic was clearly laid out by the communist third international. it identified the US as a "colonial" nation, one that had many other "nations" within it. so the idea of mongrelization has already been documented as a strategy of conquest.

my problem with what's happening now is that it isn't organic, it's forced immigration. we protected our borders for a long time and i didn't hear any US citizens sqawking about how exclusive we were. common sense tells you a nation can only absorb so many people outside its own birth rate. and, of course, that is why we had immigration quotas. nobody seemed to contest that all during that time. now we have this carnegie-funded "multi-culturalism" which demands that the target society bend and morph to fit every ethnic and racial group. whereas in times gone by, every group eventually blended and added to the target society. the US must be changed to fit into a one-world government. the US must cease to be the very thing that immigrants came here for.

forced immigration is also happening in what has always been tradtionally anglo, european, industrial, prosperous nations. not alot of third worlders pouring into india, vietnam, korea, iran, etc. how come? however, i make no bones about the fact that it has been rich anglos that have devoted themselves and their seed to the goal of their white elite class ruling the world. as cecil rhodes said, "it's the white man's burden" to do so.

the global elites have kept third world nations as such. they wanted the resources and they mde sure these nations never developed. once the wto and imf got hold of them, that was the end. what the elites, through the UN, have done to africa, southeast asia, and much of central and south america is a crime against humanity.

i am not offended by any race. i am not repulsed by any race. i do, however, have a problem with anybody who wishes the destruction of the US because it has been predominantly white. when groups go after the US, as those la reconquista factions stated, then i must prepare to defend myself. unfortunately, those factions are being used also, and i would rather dialogue with them than fight them. but if they refuse to believe that they, too, and once again, are being manipulated by white elites, then i have no choice.

i once described myself as a white baptist. that offended some people. why? were those words not accurate descriptors? there's not a racist implicaton in that, except, to the brainwashed masses, it meant that a white person speaking about being white was racist. oh, the horror. because to do that in today's society means, by extension, albeit phallaciously, that speaking about being white means you don't like blacks, asians, latinos, etc.

the US was developed by predominately white protestant families. were atrocities committed by them? yes. i can make no apology for genocide. and because genocide and conquest has taken place in every ethnic and racial culture, it still doesn't make it right. but it doesn't make us any more heinous than any other of those cultures.

the goal of the reconquista movement is the exterminaton of whites. it may not have been okay for white protestant america to have taken the land from not the mexicans but spaniards, but that doesn't mean if la mecha, la raza, aztlan wants my property in florida, another spanish territory like the southwest, that i'm going to say, sure, it's only fair. i don't think so.

if they want to live peacibly. i have no problem with that. let's just say, i don't go looking for trouble.

but getting back to illegal immigration. it's illegal. it's supported by white elites who despise white people like me because our blood lines aren't pure like theirs. they despise minorities even more, and they will utilize them as tools.

now let me add this. i don't know your spiritual leanings, but this is my take:

as long as we live on earth--the domain to which satan was cast--the dream of one-race, one-world living in peace is a myth. the attempt to become one has always been a bad idea. it's made to sound good, but on a sin-cursed earth, it cannot be achieved.

from the time Yaweh scattered all the peoples at the tower of babel, all attempts at one-worldiness have been satanic plans. when we shirk this mortal coil, there will be nothing but spirit and, then, yes there will be eternal peace and harmony.

i'm supposing that Yaweh sent races each to their continents for a reason. perhaps so we would not unite under satan to attempt an overthrow that satan failed to perpetrate in heaven.

while we're here, however, i choose not to make race or ethnicity an issue. it is only now, after living over a half-century, that i feel the need to assert that whites have indeed been targeted for prejudice, guilt, and their sins. i am tired of white males, especially, being denigrated in all facets of our culture. i have no complaints against latinos, africans, jews, you name it. but when groups target me, then regardless of their background, i refuse to accept it.

so, in this case, with militants--who just happen to be latinos--i have to come out against it. but i also come out against those whites who wish to depopulate the earth by some 80%.

that the US was founded by mainly white protestants is a fact. we certainly have had our gene pool enriched by numerous ethnic and racial peoples, to include latinos, but to attempt to overrun a nation with forced immigration is nothing less than destructive. and that is what we're seeing today.

the goal of deliberate illegal immigration is mongrelization, which seeks to wipe away any vestige of another race or culture. that is what is happening in the US. and i fully believe that it is whites that are the object of this movement.

nexus, that's what i feel. it's based on experience, history, not hatred. i truly hate no people. but i do believe i, as a white, have reasons to defend my race. i have no intentions of going off into groups like skinheads, christian identity, neo-nazis, the klan, whatever. that's hatred.

lastly, i truly regret if i said you sanctioned mongrelization. i was only really meant to communicate that your e-mail motivated me to get this issue out as i interpreted it, not that you saw it the same way, and i will make that clear in a subsequent show that treats that subject.

as for phelps, i have no desire nor intention to defend him. feel free to write him, though. i was less than pleased when he went off on race-mixing and white superiority because, as i said, i don't believe in the latter, and though i don't agree with the former, i chose not to persecute it, nor do i treat biracial individuals any differently.

i just hope you understand that i feel it necessary to defend myself because of attacks on my whiteness and US citizenship; though that doesn't mean i am opposed to any other race, ethicity, or nationality. but when anyone comes after me because i'm white and a US citizen, then that's quite a different story.

[from Vyzygoth]

newest archive guestbook email rings profile Diaryland